The Sociological Engineer

disciplesofmalcolm:

President of the Monroe, North Carolina, branch of the NAACP, Robert F. Williams (center), organizing his branch with arms in support of self-defense against white supremacists.


The side of black history you won’t see on tv.

disciplesofmalcolm:

President of the Monroe, North Carolina, branch of the NAACP, Robert F. Williams (center), organizing his branch with arms in support of self-defense against white supremacists.

The side of black history you won’t see on tv.

(via themaroonvillage)

Improved Hanson Symbol/Logo™. #ghanaian #artist

Improved Hanson Symbol/Logo™. #ghanaian #artist

Follow me on #tumblr. I keep it interesting,  for the most part. #ghanaian #sociology #life #blog #askiahanson

Follow me on #tumblr. I keep it interesting, for the most part. #ghanaian #sociology #life #blog #askiahanson

The Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a Michigan voter initiative that banned racial preferences in admissions to the state’s public universities.

“This case is not about how the debate about racial preferences should be resolved,” Justice Anthony M. Kennedy wrote in a controlling opinion joined by Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., and Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. “It is about who may resolve it. There is no authority in the Constitution of the United States or in this court’s precedents for the judiciary to set aside Michigan laws that commit this policy determination to the voters.”

Justice Sonia Sotomayor read an impassioned dissent from the bench. She said the initiative put minorities to a burden not faced by other applicants to college.

“The Constitution does not protect racial minorities from political defeat,” she wrote. “But neither does it give the majority free rein to erect selective barriers against racial minorities.” Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg joined the dissent.

In earlier cases, including one from June concerning the University of Texas, the court has said that race-conscious admissions policies can be constitutionally permissible in states that wish to use them. The new decision concerned the question of whether and how voters may prohibit affirmative action programs.

The vote in the case, Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, No. 12-682, was 6-2. Justice Elena Kagan recused herself, presumably because she had worked on the case as United States solicitor general.

The New York Times, "Supreme Court Upholds Michigan’s Affirmative Action Ban" (via inothernews)
Lol😂😂😂. Ain’t this the truth

Lol😂😂😂. Ain’t this the truth

Take heed, protect yourself.

Take heed, protect yourself.